Welcome to the website of the Limerick Reformed Fellowship. We are a group of Reformed Christians who meet together in Limerick City, Ireland, to worship the LORD according to the biblical and Reformed faith as summarised in the historic confessions of faith, namely the Heidelberg Catechism, the Belgic Confession and the Canons of Dort.
We meet twice each Lord's Day at 11 a.m. and 5.30 p.m. in Conradh na Gaelige Hall in Thomas Street, Limerick for public worship centred around the
preaching of the Word. This is done by our missionary Martyn
McGeown, sent and ordained by the Covenant Protestant Reformed Church (CPRC), Ballymena, Northern Ireland, with whom we are affiliated. All are welcome to attend and you can get more information by following the Meetings link. All of our sermons are recorded and can be listened to or viewed for free via YouTube. We also hold weekly bible studies, adult doctrines classes and children's catechism classes.
Our aim (Lord willing) is to raise a witness in Limerick City to the Reformed faith, and if it is his will, to seek the establishment of a faithful church, one where God's Word is proclaimed without compromise and where believers can worship in good conscience according to the Regulative Principle.
Feel free to contact us by signing our Guestbook or by looking up contact details at the bottom of this page. We hope you enjoy the site and may God bless your time here! |
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 03 May 2012 19:07 |
|
|
Book Reviews
|
|
Written by Rev. Martyn McGeown
|
|
Monday, 30 April 2012 19:46 |
|
Federal Vision: Heresy at the Root David J. Engelsma Reformed Free Publishing Association~ Jenison, MI, 2012 Hardback, 252. pp. (Click here to buy)
This reviewer grew up in a Presbyterian denomination in Ireland. Although the church was not very doctrinal, one thing sticks in my head even now. It concerns baptism. At every occasion of baptism, the minister said (whether this was an official baptismal form I do not know), “Baptism is a testimony to the divine initiative, that God takes the first step in our salvation ...” I often wondered what that meant, but since there was no teaching on the covenant in that church I never did find out. Now, I thank God for my ignorance because it meant when I did learn about the covenant it was the pure teaching of an unconditional covenant as developed in the Protestant Reformed Churches without the distressing detour of a conditional covenant dependent on the faith (and faithfulness and obedience of faith) of the sinner.
|
|
Last Updated on Saturday, 05 May 2012 09:42 |
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
Written by Manuel Kuhs
|
|
Sunday, 29 April 2012 18:55 |
|
Most Baptists, and even many Calvinistic Baptists such as John Piper1, John MacArthur2 and Charles Spurgeon3, teach that all children that die in infancy go to heaven, where infancy is extended to anyone under the “age of accountability”.4
In other words, they teach a universal salvation for children.
This doctrine certainly appeals to all of us, for by nature we especially pity little children. It is only human to wish that this doctrine were indeed true. However, it is our conviction that, though it may be hard for us to accept (as are many other things in Scripture), this doctrine is not according to Scripture. Exegesis cannot be based on emotions or personal wishes, but must be based solely on God’s Word.
Much could be said about this doctrine. We will restrict ourselves to (a) why this doctrine is unbiblical, (b) what the biblical doctrine concerning children who die in infancy is, and (c) why, in our opinion, most Reformed Baptists hold to this error.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 04 May 2012 23:19 |
|
Baptism
|
|
Written by Samuel Watterson
|
|
Tuesday, 29 November 2011 15:22 |
|
Most Baptists repeat the same, very poor, arguments. They
rely on people's ignorance of the Reformed position. John MacArthur's arguments
here are representative, and taken from this article:
http://www.gty.org/resources/sermons/80-369/is-infant-baptism-biblical#.Tp7nQpsUq30
Initially I tried to provide succinct and effective
refutations of these very common Baptist arguments. I consider now that I have failed
to be as succinct as I would have liked, but instead I hope at least I have
produced a helpful level of comprehensiveness for the defence of the Reformed
practice of infant baptism. John MacArthur's points are listed briefly as
headings, and my answers are below. Thanks to a Lutheran (with whom I have
strong disagreement), Charles Wiese, for directing me to this article. Some of
his arguments are also repeated here.
|
|
Last Updated on Saturday, 05 May 2012 20:34 |
|
Church
|
|
Written by Manuel Kuhs
|
|
Friday, 25 November 2011 15:45 |
|
With the
growing influence of Brethrenism and many of its distinctives,
including premillenial dispensationalism and lay preaching, their
ideas of “open time” in the public worship of the church are also
being more widely adopted by Evangelical churches.
Strictly
speaking, a true Brethren meeting consists exclusively of “open
time;” that is, there is no set format to the meeting and it is up
to the “brethren” in attendance to ask spontaneously for a hymn,
pray or even preach (although it is, at least in some groups,
permitted to prepare for a sermon beforehand). For all their boasting
of having no set format, Brethren meetings end up following the same
format every Sunday.
Many
Evangelical churches have adopted a semi-brethren approach in which a
part (usually around 15 minutes) of the church service is “open
time.” During this time, people (often even women and children! See
I Tim. 2:11ff) are free to “share” something from Scripture or
ask for a hymn. Some churches even devote one Sunday in four
completely to “open time.”
But what
does God’s Word say about this practice? Is it according to God’s
revealed will? This question every child of God involved in this
practice must ask himself, for the “Apostle of Love,” John, says,
“Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether
they are of God” (I John 4:1). So we ought to be like the Bereans,
and “search the Scriptures” to see “whether those things [be]
so” (Acts 17:11).
|
|
Last Updated on Saturday, 05 May 2012 20:37 |
|
|